27th September 2023 – (Beijing) Recent high-level economic dialogues between China and the EU spotlight the vast potential for enhanced collaboration between two of the world’s largest economies. While challenges persist, both sides displayed willingness to expand communication mechanisms across key spheres like trade, investment, and financial regulation. This spirit of pragmatic engagement can help stabilize ties amid external headwinds.

The latest talks yielded notable progress despite complex circumstances. New platforms were established for exchanging information on export controls, financial regulations, raw materials, and more. This lays foundations for dispelling misunderstandings and pursuing common interests. Though concrete outcomes require further efforts, joint commitments to continue dialogues are constructive first steps.

Crucially, new channels created can act as “reservoirs of trust” facilitating solutions when frictions emerge. For instance, the raw materials supply chain transparency mechanism directly acknowledges the need to temper risky decoupling. While optimizing supply chain security, excessive reliance on any single source should be avoided. Ongoing reciprocal communication can balance these aims.

This pragmatic approach recognises shared incentives to deepen economic bonds. With the world economy slowing and interest rates rising, both China and the EU must contend with significant headwinds. Cooperating to drive recovery makes far more sense than penalizing each other’s industries, which benefits no one.

Hence, Beijing and Brussels plan to resume high-level macroeconomic and financial dialogues suspended since 2016. Also notable are agreements to enhance market access and ease cross-border data flows – concrete areas where technical collaboration outweighs politicization. A relationship centered on managing common challenges through joint gains remains eminently feasible.

Of course, the EU calls for rebalancing asymmetries, underscoring its trade deficit with China. But rapid progress on complex issues cannot be expected overnight after extensive disengagement. Rediscovering cooperative rhythms will itself help rebalance ties. The extensive dialogues resumed across topics lay essential groundwork.

Naturally, frictions abound, including European concerns over distorted competition from Chinese state support. But overtly politicising the business climate could prompt a negative spiral; pragmatic engagement is the wiser path. The agreed export control dialogue for instance can mitigate technology access disputes.

Likewise, regular discussions around industrial subsidies and standards setting should aim at levelling the playing field, not wanton decoupling which benefits neither side nor the world economy. China also agreed to study allowing more EU banks to participate in its carbon markets – a sphere ripe for win-win collaboration.

Key is maintaining open channels to find equitable solutions, preventing disconnects from snowballing into crises. Talks displayed commitment on both sides to guide ties forward constructively. Still, realisation depends on Beijing and Brussels translating dialogues into positive action without undue delays. This requires abandoning Cold War mentalities that treat economic links as a threat. Supply chain security must balance with interdependence. Trade should expand, not contract. Chinese reforms must continue opening its economy to global partners. With shared good faith, outstanding issues are manageable. But cooperation flourishes only in a political climate of trust and reciprocity. Beijing and Brussels must avoid weaponising economic ties, instead nurturing mutual benefit and collective gains. Trade should empower, not endanger.

Likewise, Europe must determine its own China policy based on pragmatic interests, not blindly following Washington’s hostility. Cooperation where it benefits both sides remains Europe’s wisest choice. Folding into U.S. containment schemes will only undermine its own interests.

In a turbulent world, China-EU ties can model building stability through trade, reducing risky over-reliance on any single nation. Prioritising development cooperation over zero-sum competition is essential for global recovery. And balancing pragmatism with principles can ensure broad uplift.

With ongoing high-level communication, China and the EU have opportunities to strengthen constructive partnership for a shared future. But realising this potential requires top-level direction setting a cooperative tone and tangible progress converting dialogues into positive outcomes. By collaborating to solve common challenges, China and Europe can contribute to a more just, equitable world order. They must reject resorting to economic coercion that will harm all. With vision and statesmanship, their vast common interests can eclipse issues dividing them.ShareLike