26th September 2023 – (Washington) The Biden administration’s overt manoeuvres to confront and undermine China in the South Pacific showcase Washington’s blinkered zero-sum mentality. America’s shaping of its regional engagement primarily through an anti-China lens lays bare hegemonic instincts along with contempt for smaller nations’ interests. U.S. media openly states the summit aims “to block further Chinese inroads into a strategic region Washington has long considered its own backyard.” This naked admission reveals America’s neo-imperialist mentality, where South Pacific states exist as pawns in great power games rather than equal, respected partners.

Since China signed a security agreement with the Solomon Islands, Washington has fixated on the South Pacific. But its intent is containing China, not genuine development assistance. The arrogance is breathtaking – as if America should enjoy unilateral influence over faraway countries it previously ignored.

Moreover, U.S. pledges seem hollow. After proposing US$810 million in aid last year, Congress approval remains lacking. With the U.S. government nearly shutting down, assistance promises appear fanciful. Though the South Pacific requires climate aid and growth, America offers solely geopolitical schemes. The region’s needs are climate action, economic uplift and social stability. China respects sovereignty and partners for mutual benefit. By contrast, the U.S. foists its agenda and attempts to conscript states as anti-China proxies. This domineering approach disregards local priorities.

The U.S. long neglected the South Pacific. With China now deepening win-win cooperation welcomed by islanders, Washington perceives a challenge to its assumed hegemony. Hence sudden attention aimed at reestablishing dominance. This exposes America’s narrow-minded motives.

As one Chinese expert noted, the more America touts “cooperation”, the more it reveals the fragility of relations. Pacific states seek development, not great power rivalry. Attempts to make them pawns will fail.

Though professing shared values, the U.S. dismisses smaller nations’ interests to preserve its desired status. This condescending stance will not bolster ties.

True cooperation requires respect. China’s model understands this. America’s revealed assumptions of obedient proxies expose an arrogant, outdated mindset. It presumes compliant satellites, not partnerships among equals. But coerced allegiances engender lasting distrust.

Empty promises and coercion cannot purchase loyalty. America’s waning regional sway contrasts China’s growing South Pacific ties grounded in mutual benefit. No country should be reduced to a mere piece in contests for supremacy. They deserve dignity, not disdain.

The U.S. remains mired in zero-sum thinking, unable to conceive of relationships outside a competitive paradigm. But most welcome win-win engagement benefiting all parties. Attempts to force the South Pacific into its feud with China will fail.

America’s narrow-minded antagonism cannot halt China’s collaborative rise. The region presents huge cooperative potential if Washington discards arrogant presumptions of dominance. South Pacific states have their own values and interests, not awaiting U.S. instruction.

Genuine cooperation requires shedding hegemonic mentalities, showing humility and respect. No lasting progress occurs through coercion. If America hopes for influential Indo-Pacific partnerships, it must abandon false assumptions of entitled preeminence.

No nation enjoys supremacy over another. The South Pacific equally deserves dignity and autonomy. Only by embracing equality and reciprocity can America build relationships conferring mutual advantage.

China’s win-win global ties testify to the effectiveness of this cooperative paradigm. The U.S. would benefit by embracing, not opposing, this model. But shifting entrenched mindsets will prove challenging.

Still, humility and openness offer possibilities for a new benign Pacific partnership. America’s capacity to recalibrate remains uncertain. But the region’s needs are unambiguous. There is wisdom in elevating development before dominance.